Natikwa Goodwin - Art Project .

​In my advanced art class the assignment was to create a piece of artwork out of used materials. The idea of the assignment was to use household items or things that can be found around you and make them into art. 

For my assignment I used old t-shirts, needle & thread, and pillow stuffing. For my project I made home made pillows. I first took the old t-shirts and washed them. After that, turned the t-shirts inside out and sewed the bottom. After sexing the bottom i sewed the two sleeves together. Then, I turned the shirt right side out and started to place the pillow stuffing inside the t-shirt. Finally, I sewed the top of the t-shirt together and I had a new made/ home made pillow. 


This assignment was good because it used items that had no more use. Instead of things going to waste, reusing them is always a good option. The regular things that would have been thrown into the garbage and adding pollution to the world is now less then it would have been.

Uyen Nguyen (Recyclable Camera)

“Art is something unique for yourself to create and not for others to judge. Art has the ability to enrich each individual.” As a high school student, my definition of art is more than just a painting or a drawing. Art is an outlet for my feelings and emotions, it’s one of the ways I can express myself without communicating with others. Art class is one of the classes that I can escape from my in school, and it also motivates me to express myself as well as show my reactivities. I was really eager to find out all the projects we are going to get involve with in the unit.

We started our unit by connecting the environment with art. Aurora Robson with her most recent work on using recycling material inspired our teacher Mrs. Hull to come up with our unit project on using recycling objects and create our own art pieces. Aurora Robson created a sculptured out of melted bottle caps. Her inspiration was not only from using recycling product to create her art piece. But it was also because it was one of her biggest nightmares; therefore using bottle caps to create the sculptured was an outlet to show her feeling and emotion on all the negatives affect to the environment when people are abusing the environment by not recycling right.

When the project was first given to us, I was blown away by Aurora Robson’s project and was so thrilled with trying to make a different piece of art from the same material. However, I was having lunch one day and realized right on the table, there’s a soda can sitting right next to a cardboard box laying on the table. I started to realize that there are more recyclable products I can relate to in this project. Along with seeing recyclable object lying on the table, right next to it what I call my passion or in another word my camera that I’d carry with me everyday. I decided to collaborate my motivation and passion together and create something new something that could attach to me as well as describing who I am.

I’ve come to a conclusion to rebuild another version of my camera, but with recycle products. For this project I used a box that was found on the table the day I had lunch to resemble the body of the camera. For the camera lens it was replaced with cans that was also found at the lunch table, which someone decided to not recycle it. Also a long the progress of building this camera, I found a couple of plastics item I could use as extra attachment on the camera. This piece of camera was put together by masking tapes because I wanted to stay in the area of using all recyclable materials or can be use to recycle. With the brand new camera I can finally captures this experience as well as my new outlet with the environment around me when people start to take role in recycling.









Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.43
Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.43
Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.44
Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.44
Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.44 #2
Photo on 2010-11-12 at 12.44 #2

Evolution; Endangered Species

Evolution, evolution is a very touchy subject. It is also a very debatable subject in regards to many different things and the way that they’re taken. But it is something that I personally find very interesting. There’s something that I question actually and it’s not exactly on topic of evolution but instead of an occurrence, extinction. We all know that extinction is the dying off of something, but specifically in this case species. So my question is, if extinction is so posed to be a natural part of life on Earth, why should we care about protecting endangered species?


extinction-risk

This pie chart here is a proportion of all assessed species in different threat categories of extinction risk on the IUCN Red List, based on data from 47,677 species. Source: IUCN, pie chart compiled by Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, May 2010.




extinction-risk-by-species




This visualization here are the threat statuses of comprehensively assessed species by IUCN. Source: IUCN, compiled by Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, May 2010.


Endangered species are species in which are dying off due to natural or some other source of endangerment to their habitat. A very good point is that trying to save each and every endangered species is something that is practically impossible. Things we do everyday kill our world and animals habitats in a way and these aren’t things that can just change, their things that take time. But against that you can say that we are doing things to try and help like helping clean, recycling, coming up with different gases, and solar energy. A question for your thought on this though is, is it all worth it?

Personally i am a big believer that it is worth saving endangered species but not all them individually. I feel that an ideal strategy would be to focus on putting limits for human impact to entire ecosystems instead of protecting individual species based on some chances that they have of recovery over others. Chris Packman a TV naturalist did hit a good point in an article i read on extinction. He say's, "Extinction is very much a part of life on earth. And we are going to have to get used to it in the next few years because climate change is going to result in all sorts of disappearances." This was said in an article about saving Pandas (pandas in which are part of an endangered species) to where he is on the side of yes and is for saving them. But in that same article chief scientist at World Wide Fund for Nature says no, and because he feels that to much has already gone to them and not the purpose of habitat.  

I guess the answer to my question ultimately comes down to personal belief and opinion towards the subject. Although something that can be taken from this is that human-induced warming is already rapid and is expected to further accelerate. We as humans are not only harming habitats by doing stuff we have become accustomed to but also hurting ourselves with endangering our environment. 

A great video on this is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS0gpU6P-6M

Sources:
1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/sep/23/panda-extinction-chris-packham
2) http://www.createdebate.com/user/viewprofile/PungSviti
3) http://www.globalissues.org/article/171/loss-of-biodiversity-and-extinctions
4) http://www.skepticalscience.com/Can-animals-and-plants-adapt-to-global-warming.html

Evolution of Hair: Why are humans in comparison to other mammals, not completely covered in hair?

Humans are known to be of a complex species, however it is no mystery that Homo sapiens (humans) are also categorize as mammals. There are many components and characteristics that define a mammal; hair being on of them. Epidermal in origin, hair is made up of a complex structure. Mammals are the only animals in which hair is found on. Even "hairless" mammals, such as pigs, elephants, dolphins, and other cetaceans (another word for marine mammals) are partially covered with fine short hairs. Hair has many functions within itself. The many functions of hair include the retention of heat, attraction of mates, protection of skin, sexual dimorphism, an absorption of sunlight and, in the case of pets, the elicitation of a protective response from humans (us). Now how is it that humans and animals, all mammals, differentiate in how the hair is actually presented on their bodies? Though humans are covered in hair completely, they are not covered to the extent that animals are. This is because mammal body hair is an evolutionary enigma.

The common belief of hair evolution is that hair evolved to help retain body heat since hair is an excellent heat insulator. But there is no conclusion as to which evolved first: hair or warm-bloodedness (endothermy). Researchers verbally combat between the two all the time. Most ‘Darwinists’ believe that humans evolved in Africa along with other primates, all of which were almost totally covered with thick fur (again, hair). As such, a common view is that now the body hair of men and women are purely vestigial, a useless evolutionary leftover from when we were ape-looking animals. Initially hair arose as surface insulation, retaining body heat in primitive mammalian endotherms.

The reason for the putative issue of human hair loss in evolution is still unknown, and all the explanations and reasoning proposed are contradicting.


Harrub, Ph.D. Brad "Why do Humans Lack the Abundant Hair of Apes?", Article. Web. 2003. Nov 2010.<https://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2345>

Human Thermoregulation and Hair Loss,” Article. Web. 2003. Nov 2010. <http://www.modernhumanorigins.com/>

Bergman, Ph.D. Jerry " Why Mammal Body Hair is an Evolutionary Enigma" Article. Web. 2004. Nov 2010. <http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_4/Bergman.htm>



tech slide- helen

i remembered some of my peers slides and used some of there ideas. i made the background and the eyes the same color and made the words whit with a dark teal shadowing. i think this makes the words pop out now.
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.40.28 PM
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.40.28 PM

My slides: Before and After

I changed the size of the font because I wanted it to stand out more. Also, I moved the text so I had a "Third Formation" on my slide. I kept the black and white picture and purple font because the font contrasted with the background. I kept the words short and sweet. I chose my picture because it "bleeds" off the page and adds to the slide. I didn't want to change many things on my slide because I felt like it captured the essence of me. The slide that I made also incorporated many things from Presentation Zen.
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.35.21 PM
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.35.21 PM
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.35.47 PM
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 12.35.47 PM

"Extinction Happens!"


What does it mean for the process of evolution when a species becomes extinct?

The process of evolution depends greatly on the environment itself. While evolution is the change in a species over time, natural selection is the primary mechanism of change for evolution to occur. When natural selection happens, it determines what organisms are best adapted to the environment in order to survive and reproduce, passing on traits to the next generation. The organisms that pass off those traits withhold genes that are “fit” to comprise the next generation. The environment influences the genetic characteristics of an organism’s population, which changes over time.

Evolution can have three outcomes. The species can survive successfully in the environment and live on for a long time, undergoing few changes. In the second case natural selection may induce speciation, changing the older species into a new one or the third case in which, disruptive selection can occur. “A sudden shift in the environment such as a loss of habitat, a species may not been able to live long enough to reproduce. If this happens, then the species will become extinct, will die and be loss from Earth's future forever.” - Dr. Smith, from the University of San Diego

Ultimately, I’ve concluded that for the process of evolution, extinction is result of the cycle (of evolution) that is not suppose to happen. The primary goal of evolution of is to invoke change in a species so it is able to survive over time and when disruptive selection occurs the species may have a difficult time doing that, which can result in extinction. While extinction occurs in some species, I believe it is also a natural part of the evolution process that just happens. We always hear on the news about animals going extinct and how we should save the polar bears and what not, which makes sense. If there is something about the environment that humans are doing that is contributing to the extinction of these animals then it’s not natural, we should try to save the species. However, if a meteorite comes out of sky destroying all living things that’s just evolutions way of saying “Extinction Happens!” if you catch my drift. Either that or the gods are just really angry at us.

extinction-2extinction

Sources

theend
theend

Spanish tutorial


http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2195925/GinnettiSpanishtutorial.m4v

The purpose of are video was to help Ms.Gierke’s friend Noah conjugate verbs. We Split are jobs into three parts, Visuals, The Script, and Filming. We tried are best to break down and teach the changing of verbs in past and present tenses. We were told we should do this by explaining what we did over the summer, so that Noah could develop a deeper understanding on past and present tense verbs. We hope that Noah has learned a lot from are video and that he has found it easier to communicate to others!


Did our video help you?
Is there anything about our video that we could change to make it better?
What did you like about our video?
Did you learn anything?

Are humans Still evolving?


evolution

Humans are still evolving. It has been argued that the way that society is set up means that virtually everyone will reproduce, ruling out the selection pressures which were once driving us to evolve. Though in truth, we're evolving faster then ever, Or as Dr. John Hawks said, "The widespread assumption that human evolution has slowed down because it's easier to live and we've conquered nature is absolutely not true. We didn't conquer nature, we changed it in ways that created new selection pressures on us."

A study, led by Dr. John Hawks, has found that humans are evolving up to 100 times faster in the last 5000 years then they have been since we split with the ancestors of Chimps. The study has also found that humans are becoming more genetically diverse, depend on what part of the world they live in. such as the gene for lighter skin in northern Europe, or the African population becoming resistant to Malaria. Or how a majority of the Chinese and African population cannot digest lactose in milk, but a majority of Europeans have a lactose-tolerance gene. One reason could be that in northern Europe there is less sunlight and its lower in intensity, so people make less vitamin D in their skin. Vitamin D is critical for absorbing calcium, so people in Europe needed to be able to digest lactose to increase the amount of Vitamin D they have.



evolution
evolution

Does evolution stop once a species has become a "species?"

Does evolution stop once a species has become a species?
             Well my question was, does evolution stop once a species has become a “species?” And from what I have researched, evolution does not stop once a species becomes a species. Every population of living organisms is enduring some sort of evolution. Even though they’re undergoing a some sort of change, though the extent speed of the process varies significantly from one group to another. Populations that experience a great change in environmental conditions, whether that change comes in the form of a new predator or a new island to disperse to, evolve much more quickly than do populations in a more stable set of conditions. This is because evolution is driven by natural selection, and because when the environment changes, selective pressures change, favoring one portion of the population more heavily than it was favored before the change.

"Evolution: Frequently Asked Questions." PBS: Public Broadcasting Service. Web. 12 Nov. 2010. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat05.html#Q03>
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 11.26.17 AM
Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 11.26.17 AM

Darwin's Evolution and Positivism

As Darwin's theory of evolution gained credence in the scientific world, philosophers and theorists began apply natural selection to other realms of thought. Among those particularly smitten with Darwin's theory was philosopher Auguste Comte. In his work, "A General View of Positivism," Comte proposed a brand of scientific philosophy that he called Positivism. For Comte, evolution was proof that man could know the mind of God. According to Positivism, the world was governed by natural laws, and if man could discover these laws, as he had discovered evolution, he would be able to predict all natural phenomena. All was predetermined, not by a literal higher power but by science.

Comte's friend and colleague, Herbert Spencer, was an ardent positivist.He believed that all behavior of life on earth could be explained by natural selection. In several essays extolling the virtues of physical beauty, Spencer writes that unattractive physical features are signs of more significant hereditary traits - stupidity, for example - hence their (to his mind) repulsive quality.

Comte's positivism was supported by the discovery of the chemical structure of DNA in 1953. The idea that a person was the sum of their DNA - a mass of pre-written and unchangeable code - was a highly deterministic one.

In 1990, the Human Genome Project challenged this way of thinking. It was found that different strands of DNA could be interpreted differently. An experiment was conducted in which sequences of firefly DNA were inserted into the genome of E. Coli. One sequence encoded a protein that would make the bacteria glow red; the other would make it glow green. Together, the two sequences ought to have made the E. Coli produce yellow light. For some individual bacteria, this was the case. But others produced orange light, and still others incandesced turquoise. The same gene sequence produced different effects. In humans, identical sequences of genes are expressed in varying ways. Blue eyes are not all the same shade of blue; twins are never perfectly identical. Organisms are more than their genetics.

A non-deterministic world means that we are not limited by our physiology. We are forever capable of change.

Works Cited

Lehrer, Jonah. Proust Was a Neuroscientist. New York: Mariner Books, 2008. Print.

Spencer, Herbert. First Principles. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1897. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.

Comte, Auguste. A General View of Positivism. New York: E.P Dutton & Co., 1848. Web. 10 Nov 2010.

Is Jealousy an Evolutionary Adaptation?

“Despite its tragic impact on the modern world (the overwhelming majority of mate battering and spousal murders worldwide is caused by jealous violence), jealousy very likely emerged around 3.5 million years ago in our hominid ancestors as evolutionary adaptive response of vital evolutionary value for both genders”, according to Jorge N. Ferrer. Jealousy provided as an evolutionary adaptation for males to assure paternity and to avoid spending resources on other male’s offspring. Furthermore, females use jealousy to guarantee protection and support for her offspring by having a steady partner. This might explain why men feel intense feelings of jealousy if they suspect their partner of sexual infidelity and why women feel intense jealousy when they suspect their partner of emotional attachment with someone else. Interestingly enough, this modern analysis provides a connection between “gender- specific jealousy” and jealousy as an evolutionary adaptation.

Moreover, a new study at University Of Portsmouth challenges the scientific belief that only humans and chimpanzee are able to experience “secondary emotions” such as jealousy, shame and pride. They found that dogs demonstrate human-like jealousy when another human or animal are brought in to make a “love triangle.” Scientists found that dogs get particularly jealous when their owner showed affection to an outside party. Scientist from the University reported dogs demonstrated jealousy 80 percent of the time.

            Additionally, according to evolutionary psychology, jealousy is a genetic instinct used to enable possessiveness. This allows monogamy to become possible. Jealousy is simply a defense mechanism that might naturally occur if the joy of his or her partner were to arise because of someone else. Polygamists (those who life an alternative lifestyle where a man may have more than one spouse) commonly dismiss their natural instincts. For example, the Kerista community of San Franisco has coined the term “compersion” which is said to be a “non-sexual state of empathetic happiness and joy experienced when an individual's romantic partner experiences happiness and joy through an outside source, including, but not limited to, another romantic interest.”


Citations


Ferrer, Jorge N.. "Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond." Tikkun 22.1 (2007): 37-43, 60-2. OmniFile Full Text Mega. Web. 28 Oct. 2010.


http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=active&client=firefox-a&hs=zIX&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&source=hp&q=define%3A+compersion&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1

 

http://www.physorg.com/news75357071.html



What Effect Has Evolution Had on The Human Brain Thus Far?


human-brain-evolution

The most complicated object in the known universe is the human brain. On average, our brain contains about eleven billion neurons. Each one working to send, receive and process electrochemical signals. Our thoughts, emotions, movements and very existence are dependent on processes within the brain that are still largely a mystery to us. One may wonder how such a wondrous and complex organ came to be. It is here that we begin to decipher the effect of evolution on the human brain.

Assuming the theory of evolution, that organisms more suited to their environment can survive better and mate, it makes sense that, somehow, having a larger and more complex brain makes survival on Earth easier. Indeed, if one were to look at the brain size of our hominid ancestors from four million years ago, it would be discovered that their brains were a mere 400 grams. Compare that to the present size- over 1400 grams (1.4kg).

But it was more than sheer size that changed, but the actual structure of the brain. What happened earliest was the centralization of the brain’s nerve cells. What started as a loose and messy grouping of cells that would be seen in a jellyfish, turned into a spinal column and enlarged fore- and hindbrain. These parts of the brain that are relatively new are known as neocortical, literally “new brain”. Actually, things such as our abilities to speak, plan, and be conscious of our own existence depend on neocortical structures. This means that when the brain became more complex, we gained a completely different way to interact with our world. Language allowed humans to organize themselves and hunt more effectively- and having a larger and more complex brain allowed a higher capacity for intelligence, thought, and planning. These are all things that gave humanity an advantage against predators, prey, and the world’s wide variety of dangerous natural elements.

The brain also experienced a phenomenon known as encephalization, which is the concentration of sense organs and neurons in one part of the body. This is why the brain, olfactory sense, hearing, and sight are all housed in the head. This made it easier for the brain to work because the signals that neurons use wouldn’t have to travel as far if the brain is all in one place.

Evolution caused the brain to become larger, more complex, and more efficient. Much how we make our computers with more space, more speed and efficiency with every new generation (this excludes Apple, of course). There is certainly is proof of our brain’s effect on the world. Humans are definitely a thriving species. One may also consider the worldwide subjugation and abuse of animals to be proof of our dominance as a species.

But it is important to remember that neurology has only scratched the surface when it comes to the human brain. There are still plenty of things we don’t know, actually we don’t know most things. There could be all kinds of secrets within the brain waiting to be unlocked, like other senses, the power of thought, or ways to become more intelligent faster. All this would also make one wonder what evolutionary stage the brain will achieve in another thousand years.


Works Cited:

Brain evolution. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.youramazingbrain.org.uk/insidebrain/brainevolution.htm

Evolution and the brain. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v447/n7146/full/447753a.html

Without miracles 5 brain evolution and development. (2010). Retrieved from http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/g-cziko/wm/05.html